Drei M\u00f6glichkeiten, sich auf die Suche nach Wissen zu begeben. Ein altes kabbalistisches R\u00e4tsel (transliteriert):<\/p>\n
“A young student once asked a renowned teacher about the nature of knowledge. The teacher drew a circle in the sand and explained: Within this circle is that, what we know, and on the outside is that, what we do not know.
\nWe may build our lives on what is within the circle, getting proficient and skilled in the application of what we know. We may also strive to learn what is on the outside, on what we will know one day or may never know at all, becoming proficient and skilled in widening the circle. Or we may think about the thin line of the circle itself, of how it is created, and what its nature and purpose may be.”<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Ein \u00e4hnlicher Gedanke von Heinz von Foerster<\/a>:<\/p>\n “Only those questions that are in principle undecidable, we can decide.<\/cite> Und zum dritten eine Feststellung von Milan Kundera:<\/p>\n “Jeder Sch\u00fcler kann in der Physikstunde durch Versuche nachpr\u00fcfen, ob eine wissenschaftliche Hypothese stimmt. Der Mensch aber lebt nur ein Leben, er hat keine M\u00f6glichkeit, die Richtigkeit der Hypothese in einem Versuch zu beweisen. Deshalb wird er nie erfahren, ob es richtig oder falsch war, seinem Gef\u00fchl gehorcht zu haben.” Sich-Bewegen und Ausdr\u00fccken in einem Medium; die Wiederholbarkeit und Folge von Handlungen und die Bewertung des Scheiterns; das Verlassen und die Betrachtung der Grenzen des Mediums…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Drei M\u00f6glichkeiten, sich auf die Suche nach Wissen zu begeben. Ein altes kabbalistisches R\u00e4tsel (transliteriert): “A young student once asked a renowned teacher about the nature of knowledge. The teacher drew a circle in the sand and explained: Within this … Weiterlesen
\nWhy?
\nSimply because the decidable questions are already decided by the choice of the framework in which they are asked, and by the choice of rules of how to connect what we call “the question” with what we may take for an “answer.” In some cases it may go fast, in others it may take a long, long time, but ultimately we will arrive, after a sequence of compelling logical steps, at an irrefutable answer: a definite Yes, or a definite No.
\nBut we are under no compulsion, not even under that of logic, when we decide upon in principle undecidable questions. There is no external necessity that forces us to answer such questions one way or another. We are free! The complement to necessity is not chance, it is choice! We can choose who we wish to become when we have decided on in principle undecidable questions. (…)
\nWith this freedom of choice we are now responsible for whatever we choose! For some this freedom of choice is a gift from heaven. For others such responsibility is an unbearable burden: How can one escape it? How can one avoid it? How can one pass it on to somebody else?”
\n\u2013 Heinz von Foerster (1995): Ethics and Second-Order Cybernetics.<\/p>\n
\n– Milan Kundera (1984): Die unertr\u00e4gliche Leichtigkeit des Seins.<\/p>\n